( This post was taken from http://www.earthzine.org/2012/04/04/what-climate-change-means-for-farmers-in-asia/)
After an introduction from recent literature on how climate change influences the livelihood of rural people, we discuss and illustrate what climate change really means for farmers in Asia, including global warming, increasing climate variability, more and more severe climate extremes, and contributions from agriculture in diminishing greenhouse gases.
(I) I. INTRODUCTION
Vulnerable communities across the world are already feeling the effects of a changing climate. These communities are urgently in need of assistance aimed at building resilience, and at undertaking climate change adaptation efforts as a matter of survival and in order to maintain livelihoods (e.g. [1, 2]). They are in need of an urgent rural response to climate change. The reality of climate change calls for a need to understand how it might affect a range of natural and social systems, and to identify and evaluate options to respond to these effects (e.g. ). This should lead to an in-depth investigation of vulnerabilities and adaptations to climate change, which have become central to climate science, policy and practice. The capacity, however, to conduct vulnerability and adaptation assessments is still limited .
For example, the International Research Institute for Climate and Society  indicates to use a science-based approach to enhance society’s capability to understand, anticipate and cope with the impacts of climate in order to improve human welfare and the environment. We want to extend this approach to the rural communities of Indonesia and elsewhere in Asia. The basis of our approach is listening to concerned farmers to better understand their vulnerabilities and needs the way they see them. In a “farmer first” paradigm, or a participatory approach, we will be able to generate support with them and for them in facing the consequences of increased climate variability and climate change in their livelihoods .
However, applied scientists cannot do that alone. They should be the connection between applied science and the actual production environment. To that end, they in fact would be most useful to back up well-educated extension intermediaries. The latter must train, on an almost daily basis, farmers, farmer facilitators and ultimately farmer trainers and farmer communities. Unfortunately, extension services are often absent. Where they still do exist, they are poorly trained and have received little or no upgrading about the fast changes occurring in the agricultural production environment, and about the actual crises in the livelihood of farmers .
For an agricultural economy, astronomical knowledge as a regulator of the agricultural calendar was of prime importance . He who could give a calendar to the people would become their leader. More specifically, this was true for an agricultural economy that depended so largely upon artificial irrigation. It was necessary to be forewarned (…) of the beginning of the rainy monsoon season . These remarks were valid for several millennia in China and also apply for example to India and Indonesia, to rain fed and irrigated agriculture. Farmers, supported by scientists, still use such astronomical approaches of the rainy season (e.g. [10, 11, 12]). However, it must be sorted out how well such approaches can still hold, or can be adapted under the present conditions of a changing climate, in comparison to a response farming approach [13, 14].
We have indeed encouraged some of the farmers we work with in Indonesia, a majority of whom are older, that still believe in possibilities to try to adapt their local cosmology (pranata mangsa) to new conditions. They better find out for themselves the new limits of this traditional approach. We can help, for example, using simple climate predictions as these days they are generally available (e.g. ). Traditional knowledge and indigenous technologies should always be taken seriously and they should always be tried out in a participatory approach to find new limitations under changing conditions [4, 16]. Conducting local experiments together is also often a good way to create a rapport with the local farmers, and to come together to compare traditional and modern scientific approaches .
As financing for climate change adaptation in developing countries begins to flow, it is essential the governance of funding at the global and country level be shaped so the needs of the most vulnerable can be met . The core issue is country-level ownership of adaptation finance. Providers of adaptation finance must put developing countries in the driver’s seat, while the countries themselves must exercise leadership and respond to the needs of those most affected by climate change. Most importantly, civil society and vulnerable communities must be able to steer and hold accountable the way in which adaptation finance is used . The latter issue is even more important in Indonesia, the most corrupt country of Asia, at the levels of central and local authorities.
While it is relatively easy to define technical messages that can be communicated, we have to look beyond “adaptation to current climate variability” and target the basic vulnerability factors of communities.
Communication aims also at improving the learning process, and creates capacity to cope with climate variability . Measuring rainfall and observing the agronomical consequences by farmers in their plots have been a great start for such communications.
In this introduction we have brought up some points that guided our work with farmers in Indonesia. Below, we will start to exemplify what the most important consequences Indonesian and other Asian farmers face because of increasing climate variability and climate change. In a second paper we will discuss our initial approach to make farmers more aware of what is happening around them on a daily basis, and also our initial attempts to answer their many questions related to these issues.
(I) II. CLIMATE CHANGE, WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR ASIAN FARMERS?
The discussion of whether climate change exists does not need to be taken up here as the evidence is rather clear (see below), and the discussion on the causes of climate change is mostly irrelevant for those suffering the consequences. Even if we were able to reduce apparent sources of climate change, or find other geophysical ways to reduce global warming, it would continue to take place and only at a reduced speed.
The problem we face is the experts on climate variability and climate change do not really know what information the grassroots need in the short- and medium-term [13, 19], and the people working with vulnerable communities do not know what science is available . The main issue we cannot leave out here regarding what the agricultural sector could do to mitigate climate change, in a win-win situation, is that of large scale agroforestry with food security components [20, 21].
Let’s first look at the main issues behind a changing climate for Asian farmers, and at some of the consequences.
II.A. Global warming
Many tropical regions in Africa, Asia and South America could see the permanent emergence of unprecedented heat in the next two decades. According to projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest warmer seasons will be hotter than the hottest seasons of the past 50 years . Historical data from weather stations around the world was also analyzed to see if the projected emergence of unprecedented heat had already begun. When we look back at temperature records, we find extreme heat emergence is already occurring, and that climate models represent the historical patterns remarkably well . This dramatic shift in seasonal temperatures could have severe consequences for human health, agricultural production and ecosystem productivity.
Below we will come back to consequences of temperatures too high for rice production in Asia. Here, we want to note only that part of the poverty-alleviation rationale for participatory rice research is that improved rice production will give farmers greater flexibility in their use of land and labor. This outcome would be made possible by varieties that yield better, mature earlier, or tolerate drought and much more difficult heat, or by the new System of Rice Intensification, or SRI [23, 24]. This, in turn, will allow them to more easily diversify into higher-value crops without completely losing the food security provided by rice. The economic arguments for the diversification of agricultural production in Indonesia are now joined by climatological arguments .
II.B. Increasing climate variability
Agricultural production in Indonesia is strongly influenced by the annual cycle of precipitation and year-to-year variations in the annual cycle caused by El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) dynamics. The combined forces of ENSO and global warming are likely to have dramatic, and currently unforeseen, effects on agriculture production and food security in Indonesia and other tropical countries . To date, climate models have been developed with little knowledge of agricultural systems dynamics; while agricultural policy analysis has been conducted with little knowledge of climate dynamics. Integration proposed of what we know of climate dynamics and has been collected in agricultural systems models will permit an assessment of climate-related uncertainty associated with global warming and ENSO dynamics. In such integration, detailed crop dynamics models can be run with climate model forcing (e.g. [27, 28]). This integration ultimately will also demonstrate how the treatment of uncertainty affects the choice and consequences of agricultural policies .
During El Niño events, Indonesia’s production of rice, the country’s primary food staple, is affected in two important ways: First, delayed rainfall causes the rice crop to be planted later in the monsoon season, thus extending the ‘‘hungry season’’ (paceklik, the season of scarcity) before the main rice harvest; and second, delayed planting of the main wet-season crop may not be compensated by increased planting later in the crop year, leaving Indonesia with a reduced rice area and a larger-than-normal annual rice deficit . The ENSO actually can swing beyond the “normal” state to a state opposite that of El Niño, with the trade winds amplified and the eastern Pacific colder than normal. This phenomenon is often referred to as La Niña. In a La Niña year, or when a La Niña period occurs, many Asian regions inclined toward drought during an El Niño, such as Indonesia, are instead prone to more rain.
Both El Niños and La Niñas vary in intensity from weak to strong. The intervals at which El Niños return are not exactly regular, but have historically varied from two to seven years. Now, an El Niño can subside into a “normal” pattern. At other times it gives way to a La Niña. In many ways, the ENSO cold phase is simply the opposite of the warm phase. This often holds true also for the climate impacts of the two. El Niño, or warm phase, tends to bring drought to countries like Indonesia and Australia, at the west end of the Pacific, while La Niña, or cold phase, tends to bring more rain than normal . Now, it appears the frequency of these phenomena, and how they follow each other, has changed in recent times. However, we are not able to simulate these actual changes with the models that summarize our understanding, which at this moment is still very insufficient .
As a direct consequence of this capricious behavior of climate in Indonesia, the adaptation of Indonesian farmers has lagged behind enormously [32, 33]. Still, there are other reasons Indonesian farmers have been slow to adapt. First, the Integrated Pest Management Farmer Field Schools (IPM FFSs) experiments, started in Indonesia at the very end of the eighties to eradicate particularly Brown Plant Hopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) epidemics, were never sufficiently institutionalized and remained of too small a size and depth to cause much community scale absorption of the technology. The weakness of this capability in most farming communities is itself an important problem; one which has often been exacerbated by earlier agricultural development programs that fostered a dependency on external sources of expertise . Some experts claim the principles of IPM are too complex for small farmers to master , and this may be one of the reasons the movement slowly decayed and was not able to prevent new serious BPH epidemics such as in 1998-1999 and 2010-2011 . Another serious reason Indonesian farmers are lagging is the persisting government policy to achieve high productivity, and to allow the prophylactic use of pesticides to continue, supported by intensive chemical promotion strategies by corporations in Indonesia. The second issue is the apparent failure of the presently relatively large-scale Climate Field Schools approach in Indonesia, including the absence of any systematical use of seasonal climate predictions by farmers [33, 36].
II. C. More (and more severe) climate extremes
Environmental catastrophes and the forces of nature they unleash are something to behold, fear and respect . The kind of havoc they cause to the lives of mankind and the planet as a whole are nothing new. But the ferocity, frequency and magnitude of such extreme weather conditions seem to be on the rise in the last few decades, and are gathering speed with each passing year. Alone, these incidents seem to be just another environmental disaster, having local or countrywide consequences, but when one takes in the big picture, the enormity of it all hits, and they appear downright frightening  [Fig. 1].
China is a case in point. Weather took an about-turn in China in the first week of June 2011, when, only a week after the northern provinces faced the worst drought in the last 60 years, the central and southwest regions of China were hit by heavy flooding triggered by excessive and continuous torrential rains. Ironically, while the deadly flooding continued, a persistent drought was still plaguing five provinces in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Though floods are annual events in these areas of China, the extent to which these 2011 floods hit and affected people had not been witnessed in the last 20 years . In such a huge country, newspapers report on damages from severe weather and climate on a daily basis. Even covered cropping systems in China suffer from various disasters . In Indonesia, the newspapers report almost daily on landslides and their victims, the landslides always due to heavy rainfall. Agroforestry may have a protective function, as it was already used traditionally in the tropics .
Forest fires ravaged Indonesia during the 1997-98 El Niño drought episode. But that country’s officials feared torrential La Niña rains on Indonesia’s charred and de-vegetated lands could produce flash floods, serious soil erosion and an ashy brew of runoff toxic enough to kill fish and damage ecosystems . At the beginning of a more recent El-Niño period in 2009 and 2010, severe drought delayed the planting season. Farmers applied some adaptation strategies such as practicing dry-nursery instead of wet-nursery seedbeds, selecting rice varieties with more suitable lengths of their growing season and building ground-water ponds, which all proved to be beneficial [40, 41]. In the meantime, in April 2010, the El Niño situation made place for a recurring La Niña situation that overtook the prevalent El Niño with an unprecedented speed. But, we were not aware of that from any existing forecasts. This situation was worsened by a climate induced Brown Plant Hopper attack, locally known as wereng cokelat [18, 35]. Farmers face ever-increasing problems from such extreme events.
Farmer organizations in Indonesia are blaming the local and central governments for being too slow in educating farmers on how to adapt to extreme weather shifts. We should generate and support a rural response to climate change.
II.D. Contributions from agriculture in diminishing greenhouse gases
Stigter summarized this subject  partly as follows: The total Green House Gas (GHG) emission from agriculture was estimated to increase globally by about 50 percent from 2000 to 2030. Early in this period, agricultural expansion was by far the leading cause at a global scale, whether through forest conversion for permanent cropping, cattle ranching, shifting cultivation or colonization agriculture. Most prominent underlying causes of deforestation and degradation are economic factors, weak institutions and inadequate national policies. Mitigation techniques such as improved feed quality, improved manure management, improved fertilizer use and greater applied nitrogen efficiency, as well as improved water management in rice paddies, all have to be considered in order to minimize the impact of agriculture on climate in win-win situations. We mention here only such win-win situations because it seems unfair to overly pressure farmers to compensate for the larger sources in the same country.
The agricultural sector was once a major contributor to GHG emissions, but it has been superseded by the energy and transportation sectors, also in Indonesia . However, all sectors have a role to play, and all must be mobilized in the collective efforts to mitigate global climate change. Significantly, agriculture has an important role because of the large land areas involved, and because there are already many available technologies and opportunities in agriculture to contribute to the global mitigation effort, many of which can be implemented with minimal or no cost. Soil carbon sequestration has a higher mitigation potential than emission reductions in agriculture, although both are important. These are best achieved under management systems with higher carbon density, as well as improved soil conservation [42, 44]. Of course, in Indonesia the contributions to emissions of land use change and forestry together with peat fires are much more important than all other sources of emissions together , and it is here that serious changes have to be made.
The lack of an effective carbon price is currently one of the most significant detriments to collective global action. There are some strong trends in the expansion of global carbon trading, and some initiatives to promote carbon taxes. These are positive, since ultimately they will promote a realistic price on carbon. However, some key constraints still need to be overcome, namely how to mobilize the large and highly diverse global farm populations, and how to certify sequestered carbon and GHG emission reductions given the high variability inherent in agricultural production environments.
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) rules should encourage the participation of small farmers and community forest and agroforestry producers. Such rules should protect against major livelihood risks, while still meeting investor needs and rigorously ensured carbon offset goals. Agroforestry, assisted natural regeneration, forest rehabilitation, forest gardens, and improved forest fallow projects should all be eligible under CDM  because they offer low-cost approaches to carbon sequestration, while offering fewer social risks and significant community and biodiversity benefits. Short-duration tree growing activities should be permitted, with suitable discounting. Unfairly favoring large plantations should be avoided. The successful promotion of livelihood enhancing CDM sequestration projects will require investment in capacity-building and advisory services for potential investors, project designers and managers, national policy makers, and leaders of local organizations and federations [20, 42].
(I) III. CLOSING REMARKS
Above we summarized what climate change means for farmers in Asia, particularly in Indonesia. In a companion paper we will report on our work in Indonesia to try to build from the bottom up a rural response to climate change. In practice, particularly for Indonesia, this means a response to global warming and the related changing ENSO frequencies and occurrences. The approach started with meetings to answer farmers’ questions on climate change and its consequences and it proceeded with advocating and guiding simple field measurements by farmers in their plots, and increased observations and analyses of their agro-ecosystems . We advocate for this approach to be used elsewhere in Asia.
 G. Mergeai, “Agriculture as a motor of pro-poor growth: Potentials and constraints of conservation agriculture to fight rural poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa,“ An Editorial, Tropicultura, vol. 28, pp. 129-132, Sept. 2010.
 OXFAM. (2011, June 13). Owning adaptation. Country-level governance of climate adaptation finance. (OXFAM Briefing Paper 146.) [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/bp146-owning-adaptation-130611-en.pdf
 C. Ionescu, R.J.T. Klein, J. Hinkel, K.S. Kavi Kumar and R. Klein. “Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change,” Environ. Model. Assess., vol.14, pp. 1-16, Jan. 2009.
 J.M. Pulhin. (2009, Feb.). Scientific Capacity Building for Climate Impact and vulnerability Assessments (SCBCIA). Final Report. Capacity development on integration of science and local knowledge for climate change impacts and vulnerability assessments. [Online].Available: http://www.apn-gcr.org/newAPN/activities/CAPaBLE/2009/CIA2009-02-Pulhin/CIA2009-02-Pulhin_FinalReport.pdf
 IRI. (2012, Jan.). The International Research Institute for Climate and Society. [Online]. Available: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=nl&q=cache:xMyAlVW9iMMJ:http://portal.iri.columbia.edu/+International+Institute+for+climate+and+society&ct=clnk
 K. Stigter, “Introductory Part,” PART I in Applied Agrometeorology, K. Stigter, Ed. Berlin etc.: Springer, 2010, pp. 3-51.
 K. Stigter, “Education, Training and Extension,” Sect. IV.5 in Applied Agrometeorology, K. Stigter, Ed. Berlin etc.: Springer, 2010, pp. 893-899.
 K. Stigter, “Reaching farmers in a changing climate”. Roving Seminar Nr. 3. Material handed out to participants. Available form the author on request (firstname.lastname@example.org), undated, 2011.
 C.A. Ronan, The shorter science and civilisation in China. An abridgement of Joseph Needham’s original text, vol. 2 (vol. III and a section of vol. IV, part I, of the major series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, 459 pp.
 M.C. Varshneya, V.B. Vaidya, V. Pandey, L.D. Chimote, K.S. Damle, A.M. Shekh and B.I. Karande. (2010, Nov. 22). Forecasting rainfall for 2010 of Gujarat based on astro-meteorology. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/accounts-of-operational-agrometeorology/forecasting-rainfall-for-2010-of-gujarat-based-on-astro-meteorology
 V.B. Vaidya, K. Damle and V. Pandey. (2010, Nov. 1) Validation of rainfall forecast given by AAU Monsoon Research Almanac-2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/accounts-of-operational-agrometeorology/validation-of-rainfall-forecast-given-by-aau-monsoon-research-almanac-2010
 M.C. Varshneya, V.B. Vaidya, V. Pandey, A.M. Shekh, L.D. Chimote and K.S. Damle, (2011, May 16). [Online]. Available: Rainfall forecast of Gujarat for monsoon 2011 based on Monsoon Research Almanac. Availabile: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/accounts-of-operational-agrometeorology/rainfall-forecast-of-gujarat-for-monsoon-2011-based-on-monsoon-research-almanac
 K. Stigter, ”Agrometeorological services under a changing climate: old wine in new bags,” WMO-Bull., vol. 57(2), pp. 114-117, Apr. 2008.
 Y.T. Winarto, K. Stigter, E. Anantasari and S.N. Hidayah, “Climate Field Schools in Indonesia: coping with climate change and beyond,” LEISA Mag. 24(4), pp.16-18, Dec. 2008.
 NOAA. (2010, June). El Niño/southern oscillation (ENSO) diagnostic discussion. Climate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWS. [Online]. Available: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensodiscjun2010/ensodisc.doc
 A. Challinor, “Expert systems,” Sect. IV.4 in Applied Agrometeorology, Kees Stigter, Ed. Berlin etc.: Springer, 2010, pp. 885-891.
 R. Gommes, M. Acunzo, S. Baas, M. Bernardi, S. Jost, E. Mukhala and S. Ramasamy, “Communication approaches in applied agrometeorology,” Section II.D in Applied Agrometeorology, K. Stigter, Ed. Berlin etc.: Springer, 2010, pp. 263-286.
 K. Stigter and Y.T. Winarto. (2011, Jan.). Science field shops may precede climate field schools but simple adaptation to climate should be validated as part of both. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/educational-aspects-of-agrometeorology/science-field-shops-may-precede-climate-field-schools-but-simple-adaptation-to-climate-should-be-validated-as-part-of-both
 M. Rowling. (2011, June). Q&A: Why do we need a new global system for climate services? [Online]. Available: http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/qa-why-do-we-need-a-new-global-system-for-climate-services
 K. Stigter and M. R. Vishwavaram. (2011, June). A plea for a REDD plus plus approach (with a massive participatory raising and nursing of trees in the agricultural environment). [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/environment-and-sustainability/a-plea-for-a-redd-plus-plus approach
 K. Stigter, S. Walker, H.P. Das, S. Huda, Zheng Dawei, Liu Jing, Li Chunqiang, I.M. Dominguez-Hurtado, A.E. Mohammed, A.T. Abdalla, N.I. Bakheit, N.K.N. Al-Amin, Wei Yurong, J.M. Kinama, D. Nanja and P.D. Haasbroek. (2010, June). Meeting farmers’ needs for agrometeorological services: an overview and case studies. Paper presented at the WMO/CAgM Workshop “Addressing the livelihood crisis of farmers: weather and climate services”. Belo Horizonte, Brazil. [Online]. Available: http://www.cmp.vcl.cu/…/fc9a911af18abaa5d0512cf015a3217ab3f59544.pdf
 D. Hesterman. (2011, June). Climate study: Permanently hotter summers predicted in 20 Years. [Online] Available: http://www.thinktosustain.com/infocusdetails.aspx?id=%20194&utm_source=NL10&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CL
 A. Kassam, W. Stoop and N. Uphoff, “Review of SRI modifications in rice crop and water management and research issues for making further improvements in agricultural and water productivity,” Paddy Water Environ., vol 9, pp. 163–180, Mar. 2011.
 N. Uphoff, A. Kassim and R. Harwood, “SRI as a methodology for raising crop and water productivity: productive adaptations in rice agronomy and irrigation water management,“ Paddy Water Environ., vol 9, pp. 3–11, Mar. 2011.
 K. Stigter, H.P. Das and N. Van Viet (2007, June). On farm testing of designs of new cropping systems will serve Indonesian farmers. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/needs-for-agrometeorological-solutions-to-farming-problems/on-farm-testing-of-designs-of-new-cropping-systems-will-serve-indonesian-farmers
 W.P. Falcon, R.L. Naylor, M.D. Mastrandrea, D. S. Batisti, D. Vimont and M. Burke (2011, undated). Agricultural decision-making in Indonesia with ENSO variability: Integrating climate science, risk assessment, and policy analysis. Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. [Online]. Available: http://cddrl.stanford.edu/research/agricultural_decisionmaking_in_indonesia_with_enso_variability_integrating_climate_science_risk_assessment_and_policy_analysis/
 K.R. Reddy and H.F. Hodges, Eds.. Climate Change and Global Crop Productivity. Wallingford/New York: CABI Publish., 2000, 472 pp.
 R.E. Rivero Vega. (2011, Dec.). A set of logical steps in order to make an assessment of climate change impacts on agriculture. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/files-folder/repository/logical_steps.pdf
 R.L. Naylor, D.S. Battisti, D.J. Vimont, W.P. Falcon and M. B. Burke, “Assessing risks of climate variability and climate change for Indonesian rice agriculture,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. (of America) (PNAS), vol. 104, pp. 7752-7757 , May, 2007.
 Metcalf Institute. (2000, June). Potential impacts of La Niña on climate variability and extreme weather. [Online]. Available: http://www.environmentwriter.org/resources/bg/la_nina.htm
 ClimateWiki. (2011, undated). El Niño-Southern Oscillation. [Online.] Available: http://www.climatewiki.org/wiki/El_Ni%C3%B1o-Southern_Oscillation
 UNDP (Indonesia). (2007, undated). The other half of climate change. Why Indonesia must adapt to protect its poorest people. [Online]. Available: http://www.undp.or.id/pubs/docs/UNDP%20%20The%20Other%20Half%20of%20Climate%20Change%20EN.pdf
 Y.T. Winarto and K. Stigter, Eds., Agrometeorological Learning: Coping Better with Climate Change. Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG, 2011.
 Wikipedia (2011, Sept.). Farmer Field School. [Online].Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farmer_Field_School
 C.(K).J. Stigter (2012, Febr.). Unusual climate conditions of 2010/11 & pest/disease outbreaks on Java. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/accounts-of-operational-agrometeorology/unusual-climate-conditions-of-2010-11-pest-disease-outbreakes
 P.R. Siregar and T.A. Crane. Climate information and agricultural practice in adaptation to climate variability: The case of Climate Field Schools in Indramayu, Indonesia. Cult. Agric. Food Environm., vol. 33(2), pp. 55–69, Dec. 2011.
 ThinktoSustain (2011, June). Major environmental disasters: Year 2011. [Online]. Available: http://thinktosustain.com/marketspace/2011/06/major-environmental-disasters-year-2011/
 Zheng Dawei and K. Stigter, “Combating disasters in covered cropping systems,” Section III.6.B.(ii) in Applied Agrometeorology, K. Stigter, Ed. Berlin etc.: Springer, 2010, pp. 821-824.
 K. Stigter. (2011, 17 Jan.). Agroforestry in coping with meteorological and climatological risks. The Overstory [Online]. Nr. 233. Available: http://www.overstory.org
 Y.T. Winarto, K. Stigter, E. Anantasari, H. Prahara and Kristyanto, “We’ll continue with our observations, Agro-meteorological learning in Indonesia,“ Farming Matters (formerly LEISA Mag.), vol. 26(4), pp.12-15, Dec. 2010.
 Y.T. Winarto, K. Stigter, E. Anantasari, H. Prahara and Kristyanto. (2010, Nov.) Agrometeorological learning of farmers through measuring rainfall and observing fields and crops. [Online]. Available: http://www.agrometeorology.org/topics/accounts-of-operational-agrometeorology/agrometeorological-learning-of-farmers-through measuring-rainfall-and-observing-fields-and-crops
 K. Stigter, “Introduction to Part IV,“ Section IV.1 in Applied Agrometeorology, K. Stigter, Ed. Berlin etc.: Springer, 2010, pp. 857-867.
 Ministry of Environment, Republic of Indonesia (2010, Nov.). Indonesia Second National Communication Under The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) [Online]. Available: http://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/application/pdf/indonesia_snc.pdf
 S.J. Vermeulen, P.K. Aggarwal, A. Ainslie, C. Angelone, B.M. Campbell, A.J. Challinor, J.W. Hansen, J.S.I. Ingram, A. Jarvis, P. Kristjanson, C. Lau, G.C. Nelson, P.K. Thornton and E. Wollenberg, “Options for support to agriculture and food security under climate change,” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 15, pp. 136-144, Jan. 2012.